← Back to CVE List
CVE-2026-55953NVD
Vulnerability Summary
The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tls_handshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade sentinel but hands the server-chosen suite directly to ssl_handshake:handle_server_hello_extensions/9, which installs it without a membership check. The TLS 1.3 client path performs this check (per RFC 8446), so it is not affected.
An on-path attacker between the client and the intended server can respond with a ServerHello selecting an anonymous key exchange suite such as TLS_DH_anon_* or TLS_ECDH_anon_* that the client never offered. Anonymous suites do not require the server to present a certificate, so the entire verify_peer and cacerts configuration is bypassed: the attacker completes the handshake with its own ephemeral parameters, no certificate is validated, no hostname is checked, and ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket}. All subsequent application traffic is readable and modifiable by the attacker.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.15, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.4, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.4, corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.2.12.11, from 11.3 before 11.6.0.4, and from 11.7 before 11.7.4. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to ssl before 5.3.4, is affected is unknown.
An on-path attacker between the client and the intended server can respond with a ServerHello selecting an anonymous key exchange suite such as TLS_DH_anon_* or TLS_ECDH_anon_* that the client never offered. Anonymous suites do not require the server to present a certificate, so the entire verify_peer and cacerts configuration is bypassed: the attacker completes the handshake with its own ephemeral parameters, no certificate is validated, no hostname is checked, and ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket}. All subsequent application traffic is readable and modifiable by the attacker.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.15, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.4, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.4, corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.2.12.11, from 11.3 before 11.6.0.4, and from 11.7 before 11.7.4. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to ssl before 5.3.4, is affected is unknown.
CVSS v4.0 Base Metrics — Score 9.1 (CRITICAL)
Attack VectorNetwork
Attack ComplexityLow
Attack RequirementsPresent
Privileges RequiredNone
User InteractionNone
Confidentiality (Vulnerable System)High
Integrity (Vulnerable System)High
Availability (Vulnerable System)None
Confidentiality (Subsequent System)None
Integrity (Subsequent System)None
Availability (Subsequent System)None
Affected & Patched Versions
- Erlang OTP < 17.0
- Erlang OTP >= 17.0 and < 27.3.4.15
- Erlang OTP >= 28.0 and < 28.5.0.4
- Erlang OTP >= 29.0 and < 29.0.4
- Erlang OTP < 5.3.4
- Erlang OTP >= 5.3.4 and < 11.2.12.11
- Erlang OTP >= 11.3 and < 11.6.0.4
- Erlang OTP >= 11.7 and < 11.7.4
- Erlang OTP >= 84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 and < *
- Erlang OTP 17.0
- Erlang OTP 27.3.4.15
- Erlang OTP 28.5.0.4
- Erlang OTP 29.0.4
- Erlang OTP 5.3.4
- Erlang OTP 11.2.12.11
- Erlang OTP 11.6.0.4
- Erlang OTP 11.7.4
- Erlang OTP *
External References
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c6cw-pr89-w882
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-55953.html
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-55953
- https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/e6ff938116b2872bccc478af7fefb56627285b77