Critical Alert 1 Active Exploit Detected Today

CVE-2026-0257 Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS Authentication Bypass Vulnerability →
Powered by CVE Watchtower
×
Home Β» CVE Watchtower

CVE Watchtower

Advanced Threat Data Export

Filter and download the raw CVE repository (CSV/JSON) for SIEM integration and internal reporting.

Data export is locked. Upgrade your package to enable filtering and downloading.

← Back to CVE List

CVE-2026-33489NVD

Description

### Summary
CoreDNS' transfer plugin can select the wrong ACL stanza when both a parent zone and a more-specific subzone are configured. A permissive parent-zone transfer rule can override a restrictive subzone rule (name-dependent), allowing an unauthorized client to perform AXFR/IXFR for the subzone and retrieve its zone contents.

### Details
In plugin/transfer/transfer.go, stanza selection is implemented by longestMatch(), which is documented as "longest zone match wins", but it actually chooses the winner via a lexicographic string comparison:
- zone := "" // longest zone match wins (plugin/transfer/transfer.go)
- if z > zone { zone = z; x = xfr } (plugin/transfer/transfer.go)

So, a parent zone like example.org. can beat a child zone like a.example.org. purely due to lexicographic ordering ("example.org." > "a.example.org."), even though the child zone is the longer/more specific suffix match. The bypass is data-dependent (some child labels will win, some will lose), making it operationally non-intuitive.

### PoC
1. Adjust COREDNS_BIN in the PoC to point at right path (see the top-level const definitions for tunables as well)
2. Run python3 ./acl-repro.py
3. Expected output:
*** Baseline (only subzone transfer rule) ***
axfr a.example.org.: rcode=5 ancount=0 (expected REFUSED=5)

*** Candidate (add permissive parent transfer rule) ***
axfr a.example.org.: rcode=0 ancount=5 (expected NOERROR=0 with ancount>0)

*** OK ***
Subzone transfer ACL bypass reproduced: adding a permissive parent-zone stanza can override a stricter child-zone stanza due to lexicographic zone selection.

### Impact
Unauthorized zone transfer can expose full zone contents to a remote network client that was intended to be denied by a subzone-specific transfer policy.
Severity Level
HIGH (7.5)
Published Date
28/04/2026
Last Modified
08/05/2026
Exploitation Status
UNKNOWN

References