Skip to content
October 1, 2026
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q2 2026 Report
    • CVE Alerts
    • CVE Alert Settings
    • Pricing
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Free Tools
    • CVSS 3.1 Calculator
    • Certificate Viewer
    • DNS Lookup
    • Encoder & Hash Generator
    • IP / Subnet Calculator
    • Whois Lookup
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Weekly Recap
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • Technique
  • How Soon Can You Expect to See Tangible Results from a New Application?
  • Technique

How Soon Can You Expect to See Tangible Results from a New Application?

Do Son July 29, 2022 3 minutes read
tech-computer

Developing secure and fully functional custom software solutions can be an excellent way to overcome many specific challenges your business faces. However, they’re designed to fulfill particular needs, meaning that packages, suites, and applications will likely take proportionate amounts of time to meet all the enterprise’s required standards.

With that in mind, there are many stages when it comes to the life cycle of a software’s development:

  • Requirements and planning, which can take two weeks to a month
  • Architecture and design, which usually takes around two weeks
  • Coding and development, from three to nine months
  • Implementation, two weeks to one month
  • Maintenance and testing, three weeks to two months
  • Production, a month or more

As you can see, the average time associated with custom software development usually takes four months to a year. However, keep in mind that it isn’t uncommon for projects to go beyond this timeframe.

The project scope will determine the time frame

It isn’t easy to measure how much time the custom software development requires because of the different requirements of specific projects. For example, some conditions might include the particular functionalities, APIs, modules, external libraries, and security features for software development for a large enterprise or a small one.

How the application must be implemented and integrated within existing systems can also affect its time frame. For example, if quality assurance testers find software flaws and bugs, remediation may take more time. Other considerations are the business logic’s complexity, database code’s migration, platform support, the scalability of the coding, and more.

Small-scale and large-scale projects

Custom software projects can generally be categorized into small-scale and large-scale projects. As their name suggests, the latter tends to be associated with more giant enterprises requiring more integrations, including database data migration, API programming, or legacy system remediation. Available integrations could be custom software linking with CMS applications, CRM suites, etc.

On the other hand, smaller-scale projects need less programming, integration, and QA testing and fewer modules. This is because of its more straightforward nature. That said, system integration and security concerns will generally be more significant with the bigger projects, leading to more extended time frames for adequate remediation.

Quicker isn’t always better

When deciding on the development process, coding language tends to be included in the discussion. However, an integral factor is a performance and scalability versus the speed of custom software. For example, scripting languages might be quicker to do than actual object-oriented languages like Java or C++, and enterprise solutions may require more robust languages for meeting their business objectives. Because of this, faster development times may not always be a better approach.

Conclusion

New applications, especially custom software, will take a while before their implementation can begin producing tangible results for a business. Unfortunately, it’s impossible to give an exact time frame on when it’ll start showing results. It will depend on many factors, ranging from the project’s scale and scope to the development team. So keep these in mind if you’re looking to develop new software.

SHARE
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on LinkedInShare on TelegramShare on BlueskyShare on Mastodon

Search

Translation

CVE ALERTS
📈

EPSS Spike Alerts
Catch risk spikes before they make headlines.

🎯

Custom EPSS/CVSS
Set score thresholds to effectively filter noise.

🛡️

Exploit Intel
Real-world exploit signals beyond the KEV catalog.

🐙

GitHub Issues
Auto-create alert tickets without duplication.

📬

Weekly Digest
Clean summaries, eliminating email spam.

🏷️

Watchlist Groups
Tag vulnerabilities by team (Infra/AppSec/SOC).

🔀

Smart Routing
Route chat channels based on severity levels.

🚨

RBP Tracker
Early warning detection and tracking system.

Subscribe – $7/mo or try free for 14 days →

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-100382CVSS 10.0
    Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\'OS Command Injection\') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-76504CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability in the API session-based authentication management of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 30, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 30, 2026
  • CVE-2026-86950CVSS 8.8
    An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.1 and...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 29, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 29, 2026
  • CVE-2026-88772
    Memory overflow vulnerability leading to remote code execution or denial of service.
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 27, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-88771
    Remote code execution due to improper input validation that can allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands.
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 27, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-65660CVSS 8.8
    Improper control of generation of code (\'code injection\') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 25, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 25, 2026
  • CVE-2026-5430CVSS 10.0
    The JWT authentication mechanism accepts tokens signed with algorithms other than those explicitly configured or supported. This allows...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 24, 2026
  • CVE-2026-71362CVSS 9.1
    Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 24, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Critical Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-75957CVSS 9.8
    The Ultimate Multisite – WordPress Multisite SaaS & WaaS Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-15989CVSS 9.8
    The Super Forms – Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-92966CVSS 9.1
    The The Appointment Booking Plugin – LatePoint | Calendar & Scheduling for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-101148CVSS 10.0
    The BackupSheep WordPress Backup Plugin WordPress plugin through 1.8 does not properly validate its integration key, treating an...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-62329CVSS 9.8
    Vulnerability Type: CWE-1392: Use of Default Credentials Attack type: Unauthenticated remote Impact: Unauthenticated users can access the default...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-103264CVSS 9.3
    Fleet versions before 4.87.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the device API that accepts hostnames and hardware...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-103244CVSS 9.3
    ground-station versions before 0.8.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the setup.restore command that allows unauthenticated attackers to...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-57496CVSS 9.6
    ## REST Path Traversal Bypasses Token Redaction in netlicensing-mcp ### Summary The `netlicensing_get_product` MCP tool in `netlicensing-mcp` interpolates...
    📅 Updated: Oct 1, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Daily CyberSecurity

  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise with us
  • Announcement
  • Contact
  • Contributor Register
  • Login
  • Disclaimer
  • DCMA
  • Privacy Policy
  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
  • Contact Us

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

  • CVE Watchtower
  • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
  • Q2 2026 Report
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
© 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.