Skip to content
November 12, 2026
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • ADVISORIES
    • Microsoft
    • Fortinet
    • Ivanti
    • Cisco
    • Linux
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q3 2026 Report
    • CVE Alerts
    • CVE Alert Settings
    • Pricing
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Free Tools
    • CVSS 3.1 Calculator
    • Certificate Viewer
    • DNS Lookup
    • Encoder & Hash Generator
    • IP / Subnet Calculator
    • Whois Lookup
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • Technique
  • How Soon Can You Expect to See Tangible Results from a New Application?
  • Technique

How Soon Can You Expect to See Tangible Results from a New Application?

Do Son July 29, 2022 3 minutes read
tech-computer

Developing secure and fully functional custom software solutions can be an excellent way to overcome many specific challenges your business faces. However, they’re designed to fulfill particular needs, meaning that packages, suites, and applications will likely take proportionate amounts of time to meet all the enterprise’s required standards.

With that in mind, there are many stages when it comes to the life cycle of a software’s development:

  • Requirements and planning, which can take two weeks to a month
  • Architecture and design, which usually takes around two weeks
  • Coding and development, from three to nine months
  • Implementation, two weeks to one month
  • Maintenance and testing, three weeks to two months
  • Production, a month or more

As you can see, the average time associated with custom software development usually takes four months to a year. However, keep in mind that it isn’t uncommon for projects to go beyond this timeframe.

The project scope will determine the time frame

It isn’t easy to measure how much time the custom software development requires because of the different requirements of specific projects. For example, some conditions might include the particular functionalities, APIs, modules, external libraries, and security features for software development for a large enterprise or a small one.

How the application must be implemented and integrated within existing systems can also affect its time frame. For example, if quality assurance testers find software flaws and bugs, remediation may take more time. Other considerations are the business logic’s complexity, database code’s migration, platform support, the scalability of the coding, and more.

Small-scale and large-scale projects

Custom software projects can generally be categorized into small-scale and large-scale projects. As their name suggests, the latter tends to be associated with more giant enterprises requiring more integrations, including database data migration, API programming, or legacy system remediation. Available integrations could be custom software linking with CMS applications, CRM suites, etc.

On the other hand, smaller-scale projects need less programming, integration, and QA testing and fewer modules. This is because of its more straightforward nature. That said, system integration and security concerns will generally be more significant with the bigger projects, leading to more extended time frames for adequate remediation.

Quicker isn’t always better

When deciding on the development process, coding language tends to be included in the discussion. However, an integral factor is a performance and scalability versus the speed of custom software. For example, scripting languages might be quicker to do than actual object-oriented languages like Java or C++, and enterprise solutions may require more robust languages for meeting their business objectives. Because of this, faster development times may not always be a better approach.

Conclusion

New applications, especially custom software, will take a while before their implementation can begin producing tangible results for a business. Unfortunately, it’s impossible to give an exact time frame on when it’ll start showing results. It will depend on many factors, ranging from the project’s scale and scope to the development team. So keep these in mind if you’re looking to develop new software.

Search

CVE ALERTS
📈

EPSS Spike Alerts
Catch risk spikes before they make headlines.

🎯

Custom EPSS/CVSS
Set score thresholds to effectively filter noise.

🛡️

Exploit Intel
Real-world exploit signals beyond the KEV catalog.

🐙

GitHub Issues
Auto-create alert tickets without duplication.

📬

Weekly Digest
Clean summaries, eliminating email spam.

🏷️

Watchlist Groups
Tag vulnerabilities by team (Infra/AppSec/SOC).

🔀

Smart Routing
Route chat channels based on severity levels.

🚨

RBP Tracker
Early warning detection and tracking system.

Subscribe – $7/mo or try free for 14 days →

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-20320CVSS 7.5
    A vulnerability in the Open Client Interface (OCI) XML Parser of Cisco BroadWorks could allow an unauthenticated, remote...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-111793CVSS 4.3
    Openwave Webtop Media Transcoder does not enforce administrator-defined file type restrictions to restrict the file-types to be converted....
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-111560CVSS 8.6
    Improper neutralization of shell metacharacters in the timezone configuration field in certain Barracuda appliance products using common Barracuda...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-116606CVSS 9.3
    An authentication bypass in Barracuda Email Security Gateway versions earlier than 9.4.0.030 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-125350
    Use after free in XML. Reported by anonymous on 2026-11-06. Google is aware that an exploit for CVE-2026-125350...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-124194CVSS 6.5
    Product ui does not warn user of unsafe actions in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-123751CVSS 9.8
    The WP Duplicate WordPress plugin through 1.1.11 does not properly verify a request authentication value and does not...
    Watchtower Verified📅 Updated: Nov 9, 2026
  • CVE-2026-114713CVSS 8.6
    The labeled-response module in UnrealIRCd 6.0.0 before 6.2.7.1 does not escape the IRCv3 "label" message tag when echoing...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Nov 9, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Critical Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-8333CVSS 9.4
    A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Microchip the TimePictra platform could allow an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to store...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-12591CVSS 9.9
    Zohocorp ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus versions below 4818 is affected by an authenticated technician may exploit insufficient permission validation in the delegated administration...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-12507CVSS 9.1
    Zohocorp ManageEngine AssetExplorer versions below 7860, ServiceDesk Plus versions below 15290, ServiceDesk Plus MSP versions below 15150, and...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-107935CVSS 9.3
    A path traversal vulnerability was found in gvproxy, the network forwarder provided by the gvisor-tap-vsock package. The unauthenticated...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-125883CVSS 9.3
    Improper restriction of XML external entity reference vulnerability in N-able N-central allows XML Schema Poisoning. This issue affects...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-76954CVSS 9.8
    An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command vulnerability in the Auth API in Synology...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-126785CVSS 9.3
    A vulnerability has been found in rmalright TR-VISION HOME 2.0.5. Impacted is the function sub_11504 in the library...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2022-23851CVSS 9.8
    Netaxis API Orchestrator (APIO) before 0.19.3 allows server side template injection (SSTI).
    📅 Updated: Nov 11, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Daily CyberSecurity

  • About Daily CyberSecurity
  • Advertise with us
  • Announcement
  • Contact
  • Contributor Register
  • Login
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

  • CVE Watchtower
  • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
  • Q3 2026 Report
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
© 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.