Skip to content
September 23, 2026
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q2 2026 Report
    • CVE Alerts
    • CVE Alert Settings
    • Pricing
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Free Tools
    • CVSS 3.1 Calculator
    • Certificate Viewer
    • DNS Lookup
    • Encoder & Hash Generator
    • IP / Subnet Calculator
    • Whois Lookup
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Weekly Recap
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • Technique
  • Should you opt for containers or serverless computing?
  • Technique

Should you opt for containers or serverless computing?

Do Son June 12, 2020 3 minutes read

Containers vs serverless computing are frequently looked upon as engaging development technologies. However, if integrated both can be a strong combination.  It can be difficult to decide which one will be best for you. Read along to have an idea.

What is a container?

It is a lightweight, single, feasible package of a software piece. It includes all required for running it such as code, system tools, and libraries, runtime as well as settings. It will be solving the problem related to running the software when it is moved from a computing environment by isolating it essentially from its surrounding. For example, containers will let you move the software from development to staging as well as from staging to production along with running it trust worthily irrespective of every environments’ differences.

Pros:

  • Great control as well as flexibility
  • The migration path is easier
  • Portable

Cons:

  • Administrative work
  • Slower extensibility
  • Difficult to begin
  • Greater manual intervention
  • Huge running costs

What is a serverless?

It is known to be a development approach that replaces virtual machines running for a long time with computing power coming into existence on some demand as well as disappears right away after use. Regardless of the name, some servers are involved to run the application. The cloud service provider will manage these servers as well as they will not run always. You will be able to configure events like API requests or upload of files that trigger the serverless function for execution. Once the action gets completed, the server stops working until there is a request for another action. You will never be billed for any idle time.

Pros:

  • No administration
  • Pay as per execution
  • No cost for any idle time
  • Auto scaling
  • Clear separation of codebase
  • Much lower administration as well as maintenance load
  • Quick time-to-market

Cons:

  • Zero standardization
  • Cold starts
  • Black box surrounding
  • Difficult to build complex apps

When should you make use of each of them?

Containers will be best used for any complex applications running long where you will be requiring huge control over your surrounding as well as you will have all resources for setting up and maintaining the application. They will also be very beneficial to migrate monolithic legacy apps to the cloud. You can break these applications into some containerized microservice as well as orchestrate them by making use of a tool.  They are perfect for apps such as any large e-commerce site which will contain product listings, inventory management, payment processing, and so on. Containers can be used for packaging each service without worrying about any time limit and memory issues.

Serverless will be best applied for applications that require to be ready for performing tasks but do not need to run always. For example, they will be a great selection for the Internet of Things app detecting the presence of water for identifying any leak in a water storage facility. The app must be ready to perform during any leak even if it does not run always. They will be perfect when development speed as well as cost minimization is overriding along with you are not interested in managing extensibility issues.

Final words

Select containers when you will require flexibility and when you require to migrate any legacy service. Select serverless if you require speed of development, any automatic scaling as well as remarkably reduced runtime prices.

SHARE
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on LinkedInShare on TelegramShare on BlueskyShare on Mastodon
Tags: containers serverless

Search

Translation

CVE ALERTS
📧

Email Delivery
Get threat intel straight to your inbox.

♾️

Unlimited Vendors
Track every technology in your stack.

🚨

All New CVE Alerts
Be the first to know about new flaws.

⚙️

Custom EPSS Threshold
Filter noise, focus on real risks.

💬

Slack & Teams Webhook
Integrate directly into your SecOps.

🚫

100% Ad-Free
Enjoy an uninterrupted reading experience.

$7/mo
Subscribe Now

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-94127CVSS 9.8
    When a BIG-IP APM access policy and an OAuth profile is configured on a virtual server, specific malicious...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 22, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-85102CVSS 9.8
    Improper certificate trust validation during VPN negotiation in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway may allow an unauthenticated remote...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 22, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-93616CVSS 9.8
    A directory traversal and file upload vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload and execute arbitrary scripts on...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 22, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-93952CVSS 10.0
    VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) on-prem has a security issue where this issue may allow a remote attacker to access...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 22, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-32996CVSS 7.3
    A vulnerability in Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows allows for Local Privilege Escalation.
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-7273CVSS 8.8
    A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the CGI program of Zyxel GS1900-48HPv2 firmware versions through 2.90(ABTQ.1)C0 could allow a...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 21, 2026
  • CVE-2026-58138CVSS 9.8
    Orkes Conductor 3.21.21 before 3.30.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Sep 20, 2026
  • CVE-2026-86124CVSS 9.8
    AutoAgent contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the TCP server that binds to all interfaces and...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Sep 19, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Critical Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-84082CVSS 9.8
    IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper...
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-84064CVSS 9.9
    IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to...
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-82967CVSS 9.8
    IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to...
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-82340CVSS 9.8
    IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to unauthenticated insecure deserialization and attacker-controlled reflective method dispatch in the...
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-82000CVSS 9.6
    Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in...
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-81995CVSS 9.1
    Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary...
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-81657CVSS 9.8
    IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system...
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-80442CVSS 9.9
    IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the exportCertificate functionality....
    📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Daily CyberSecurity

  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise with us
  • Announcement
  • Contact
  • Contributor Register
  • Login
  • Disclaimer
  • DCMA
  • Privacy Policy
  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
  • Contact Us

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

  • CVE Watchtower
  • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
  • Q2 2026 Report
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
© 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.