• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
Skip to content
May 26, 2026
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Watchtower
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Vulnerability Report
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • Technique
  • Should you opt for containers or serverless computing?
  • Technique

Should you opt for containers or serverless computing?

Ddos June 12, 2020 3 minutes read

Containers vs serverless computing are frequently looked upon as engaging development technologies. However, if integrated both can be a strong combination.  It can be difficult to decide which one will be best for you. Read along to have an idea.

What is a container?

It is a lightweight, single, feasible package of a software piece. It includes all required for running it such as code, system tools, and libraries, runtime as well as settings. It will be solving the problem related to running the software when it is moved from a computing environment by isolating it essentially from its surrounding. For example, containers will let you move the software from development to staging as well as from staging to production along with running it trust worthily irrespective of every environments’ differences.

Pros:

  • Great control as well as flexibility
  • The migration path is easier
  • Portable

Cons:

  • Administrative work
  • Slower extensibility
  • Difficult to begin
  • Greater manual intervention
  • Huge running costs

What is a serverless?

It is known to be a development approach that replaces virtual machines running for a long time with computing power coming into existence on some demand as well as disappears right away after use. Regardless of the name, some servers are involved to run the application. The cloud service provider will manage these servers as well as they will not run always. You will be able to configure events like API requests or upload of files that trigger the serverless function for execution. Once the action gets completed, the server stops working until there is a request for another action. You will never be billed for any idle time.

Pros:

  • No administration
  • Pay as per execution
  • No cost for any idle time
  • Auto scaling
  • Clear separation of codebase
  • Much lower administration as well as maintenance load
  • Quick time-to-market

Cons:

  • Zero standardization
  • Cold starts
  • Black box surrounding
  • Difficult to build complex apps

When should you make use of each of them?

Containers will be best used for any complex applications running long where you will be requiring huge control over your surrounding as well as you will have all resources for setting up and maintaining the application. They will also be very beneficial to migrate monolithic legacy apps to the cloud. You can break these applications into some containerized microservice as well as orchestrate them by making use of a tool.  They are perfect for apps such as any large e-commerce site which will contain product listings, inventory management, payment processing, and so on. Containers can be used for packaging each service without worrying about any time limit and memory issues.

Serverless will be best applied for applications that require to be ready for performing tasks but do not need to run always. For example, they will be a great selection for the Internet of Things app detecting the presence of water for identifying any leak in a water storage facility. The app must be ready to perform during any leak even if it does not run always. They will be perfect when development speed as well as cost minimization is overriding along with you are not interested in managing extensibility issues.

Final words

Select containers when you will require flexibility and when you require to migrate any legacy service. Select serverless if you require speed of development, any automatic scaling as well as remarkably reduced runtime prices.

Share this article:

Facebook Post LinkedIn Telegram

No related posts.

Tags: containers serverless

Search

Translation

CVE WATCHTOWER
🚨

Receive alerts for vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.

⚑

Get notified instantly when a Proof of Concept (PoC) exploit is published.

πŸ”

Access critical info on vulnerabilities even when marked as "RESERVED".

🧠

Insights powered by decades of expertise and global intelligence sources.

🎯

Customize alerts with up to 10 keywords for your specific tech stack.

πŸ“Š

Export the raw CVE database for SIEM integration and reporting.

Upgrade Package

πŸ”΄ Live Critical Threats

  • CVE-2026-42773CVSS 9.3
    Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')...
  • CVE-2026-42774CVSS 9.3
    Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')...
  • CVE-2026-9478CVSS 9.8
    A weakness has been identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Impacted is the...
  • CVE-2026-9477CVSS 9.8
    A security flaw has been discovered in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This issue...
  • CVE-2026-9476CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This vulnerability affects the...
  • CVE-2026-9475CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This affects the function...
  • CVE-2026-9458CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The impacted element is...
  • CVE-2026-9457CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The affected element is...
  • CVE-2026-9456CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Impacted is the function...
  • CVE-2026-9455CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This issue affects...
Powered by CVE WATCHTOWER

Recent Zero-Day Vulnerabilities

  • Exploited in the Wild: Critical OWA Spoofing Flaw (CVE-2026-42897) Hits On-Premises Exchange Servers
  • Exploited in the Wild: Maximum CVSS 10 SD-WAN Flaw (CVE-2026-20182) Grants Admin Control
  • Exploited in the Wild: Critical 9.8 CVSS RCE Hits Canon GUARDIANWALL MailSuite
  • Exploit Code Released: Public PoC Dumps for Windows BitLocker Bypass and SYSTEM Elevation Zero-Days
  • Exploited in the Wild: “Dirty Frag” Linux Vulnerability Grants Instant Root Access
  • Under Active Attack: Ivanti EPMM Zero-Day Exploited in the Wild via Harvested Admin Credentials
Our Websites
  • Penetration Testing Tools
  • The Daily Information Technology
  • Daily CyberSecurity

    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise with us
    • Announcement
    • Contact
    • Contributor Register
    • Login
    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
    • Contact Us

    When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA NOTICE
    • Linkedin
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
    Copyright Daily CyberSecurity Β© All rights reserved.