Skip to content
November 12, 2026
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • ADVISORIES
    • Microsoft
    • Fortinet
    • Ivanti
    • Cisco
    • Linux
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q3 2026 Report
    • CVE Alerts
    • CVE Alert Settings
    • Pricing
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Free Tools
    • CVSS 3.1 Calculator
    • Certificate Viewer
    • DNS Lookup
    • Encoder & Hash Generator
    • IP / Subnet Calculator
    • Whois Lookup
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • Technique
  • How To Perform A Successful Network Penetration Test
  • Technique

How To Perform A Successful Network Penetration Test

Do Son May 27, 2022 4 minutes read
Img_2022_05_28_07_32_10

Cybersecurity threats are the #1 concern for every company. Just one attack can cost millions of dollars, completely shut down operations, or destroy a reputation. A network penetration test will solve this problem and be able to secure the business. Let’s get to know it better and find out how to execute it successfully.

Definition  

Network penetration test – is the process of checking the software system of a site or application to identify security vulnerabilities. It is carried out as a simulation of a cyber attack and is most often carried out by white hat hackers. At the same time, specialists have legal access to the entire system. In the end, the company receives a detailed report with all the data on vulnerabilities and opportunities to improve the network and the security system as a whole.

Unlike a similar process – vulnerability assessment – a penetration test gives a more realistic picture of the state of the security system, because. how it is conducted based on potential attacks.

How to Perform a Successful Network Penetration Test

To conduct a test, it is enough to complete 4 stages: collecting information and the scope of the test, reconnaissance, and research, the penetration test itself, and collecting a report with further recommendations. 

Stage 1. Collection of information and scope of the test

This stage is based on the analysis of the entire system and the selection of the most appropriate test methods. So, each network asset is examined, the volume of the future invasion is selected and its boundaries are outlined.

When choosing a method of conducting, 3 main testing options are considered:

  1. Black box. It is carried out according to the scenario as if a hacker wants to hack the system with minimal knowledge of the network functionality or a complete lack of awareness about them. It takes the least time, because. is focused on checking the vulnerabilities of only the external network to assess the possibility of a targeted attack. Tools: Applitools, Selenium, etc.
  2. gray box. It is carried out on the condition that the hacker already has an idea about the functioning of the network. In the course of the action, both internal and external vulnerabilities are checked. The option is great for identifying problems at the stages of a possible hack: login data, internal information, documents, etc. Tools: NUnit, Burp Suite, Postman, etc.
  3. White box. It is carried out to identify any possible vulnerabilities, and to check the overall permeability of the network. It takes a lot of time but gives a complete picture of the state of the security system. Tools: GoogleTest, RCUNIT, etc.

It is important to understand exactly how and when it is best to conduct a test, what information will be used for this, and what vulnerabilities the operations will focus on.

Stage 2. Exploration and research

To get information about vulnerabilities and their location, you should use reconnaissance – a port scanner. When the data is found, it is necessary to investigate the entire path of the hack. For example, which network ports were open. Tools: NetScanTools, Port Authority, etc.

Packet analysis is also used for intelligence – this is the search and study of data packets that pass through the network. With its help, it is possible to find and investigate fake packages that are used by attackers. Tools: Network Mapper or Wireshark.

At this stage, an analysis is carried out both from a technical point of view and from a human point of view. That is, the study of all possible hacking scenarios is used.

Stage 3. The penetration test itself

It consists in conducting a penetration test based on the received vulnerabilities during stage 2. It uses custom scripts. It is important to check each of the identified problems. The stage is necessary to assess how far an attacker can go when trying to hack and still go unnoticed. Most often, the Metasploit framework is used for its implementation.

Stage 4. Collection of a report with further recommendations

At this stage, all the results that were obtained during the previous manipulations are collected. Together they form the finished report. Then you should start working on the bugs and install updates. In addition, you can implement entire software changes and tools that will provide the proper level of security.

Conclusion

As you can see, network penetration testing is the most important tool for checking the operation of a security system. Thanks to the realistic simulation of a hacker attack, a company can get a full report on the effectiveness and quality of its work. We also analyzed the 4 stages of a successful test. Use them to prevent a possible cyberattack and data leakage into the wrong hands. 

Search

CVE ALERTS
📈

EPSS Spike Alerts
Catch risk spikes before they make headlines.

🎯

Custom EPSS/CVSS
Set score thresholds to effectively filter noise.

🛡️

Exploit Intel
Real-world exploit signals beyond the KEV catalog.

🐙

GitHub Issues
Auto-create alert tickets without duplication.

📬

Weekly Digest
Clean summaries, eliminating email spam.

🏷️

Watchlist Groups
Tag vulnerabilities by team (Infra/AppSec/SOC).

🔀

Smart Routing
Route chat channels based on severity levels.

🚨

RBP Tracker
Early warning detection and tracking system.

Subscribe – $7/mo or try free for 14 days →

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-20320CVSS 7.5
    A vulnerability in the Open Client Interface (OCI) XML Parser of Cisco BroadWorks could allow an unauthenticated, remote...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-111793CVSS 4.3
    Openwave Webtop Media Transcoder does not enforce administrator-defined file type restrictions to restrict the file-types to be converted....
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-111560CVSS 8.6
    Improper neutralization of shell metacharacters in the timezone configuration field in certain Barracuda appliance products using common Barracuda...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-116606CVSS 9.3
    An authentication bypass in Barracuda Email Security Gateway versions earlier than 9.4.0.030 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-125350
    Use after free in XML. Reported by anonymous on 2026-11-06. Google is aware that an exploit for CVE-2026-125350...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-124194CVSS 6.5
    Product ui does not warn user of unsafe actions in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an unauthorized attacker to...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Nov 10, 2026
  • CVE-2026-123751CVSS 9.8
    The WP Duplicate WordPress plugin through 1.1.11 does not properly verify a request authentication value and does not...
    Watchtower Verified📅 Updated: Nov 9, 2026
  • CVE-2026-114713CVSS 8.6
    The labeled-response module in UnrealIRCd 6.0.0 before 6.2.7.1 does not escape the IRCv3 "label" message tag when echoing...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Nov 9, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Critical Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-8333CVSS 9.4
    A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Microchip the TimePictra platform could allow an authenticated, low-privileged attacker to store...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-12591CVSS 9.9
    Zohocorp ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus versions below 4818 is affected by an authenticated technician may exploit insufficient permission validation in the delegated administration...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-12507CVSS 9.1
    Zohocorp ManageEngine AssetExplorer versions below 7860, ServiceDesk Plus versions below 15290, ServiceDesk Plus MSP versions below 15150, and...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-107935CVSS 9.3
    A path traversal vulnerability was found in gvproxy, the network forwarder provided by the gvisor-tap-vsock package. The unauthenticated...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-125883CVSS 9.3
    Improper restriction of XML external entity reference vulnerability in N-able N-central allows XML Schema Poisoning. This issue affects...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-76954CVSS 9.8
    An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command vulnerability in the Auth API in Synology...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2026-126785CVSS 9.3
    A vulnerability has been found in rmalright TR-VISION HOME 2.0.5. Impacted is the function sub_11504 in the library...
    📅 Updated: Nov 12, 2026
  • CVE-2022-23851CVSS 9.8
    Netaxis API Orchestrator (APIO) before 0.19.3 allows server side template injection (SSTI).
    📅 Updated: Nov 11, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Daily CyberSecurity

  • About Daily CyberSecurity
  • Advertise with us
  • Announcement
  • Contact
  • Contributor Register
  • Login
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

  • CVE Watchtower
  • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
  • Q3 2026 Report
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
© 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.