Skip to content
September 11, 2026
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q2 2026 Report
    • CVE Alerts
    • CVE Alert Settings
    • Pricing
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Weekly Recap
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • Technique
  • Introduction to Broken Access Control (OWASP Top 10)
  • Technique

Introduction to Broken Access Control (OWASP Top 10)

Do Son July 22, 2021 5 minutes read
kr-cyber-sec

Image Source

Introduction

Imagine for a second that everyone who walks into your bank can go anywhere within the bank—the control room, the manager’s office, the vault, etc.—without being stopped by anyone. Sounds weird, right? I doubt anyone would patronize such a bank, and it would be mostly on the grounds of security. The bank wouldn’t feel secure enough to most people.

As a result of digitization, which is becoming an increasingly critical part of how the world functions, the average netizen expects software solutions and digital infrastructure to be as secure as a bank vault. The premise of this expectation is based on the fact that our financial information and other personal data is stored online, and a data breach can prove rather costly to every stakeholder.

Let us look at an example that’s closer to home. On the internet, when you log in to Facebook, there is code written to ensure that the only way a person can access your account is by having your username and password. Even if someone else has the URL link to your profile, the person cannot edit your profile without logging in to your account.

If someone gains unauthorized access to your profile or messages because they have the URL link (without being signed in to your profile), then we have a case of broken access control. This seems rather harmless until you imagine a situation where someone can control your PayPal account because they typed in the URL that accesses your PayPal account.

Cybersecurity is a growing concern for both owners of digital infrastructure and users of these infrastructures. To help people mitigate cybersecurity risks, a list of the most likely cybersecurity threats has been collated by OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project): OWASP Top 10.

The OWASP Top 10 serves as a guideline for developers of the risks they should protect themselves against to create a stronger software solution.

Image Source

Broken Access Control And How to Avoid It

Access control is often used interchangeably with authorization—they both control the rights and privileges of a user by leveraging the utilities of digital infrastructure. As netizens, we access different platforms where we are able to do certain things depending on whether we’re premium or basic members, users or admin members, and these privileges keep us in check.

If we’re unable to prevent people from gaining access to resources and utilities that they have no right to be using, we’re dealing with broken access control. With cybercrime increasing by 600% during the COVID-19 pandemic, developers have an implicit and explicit burden to protect users as much as possible.

Broken access control involves injecting fictitious parameters (basically unverified data) using SQL (structured query language) into a software solution that interacts with a database to compromise the entire digital infrastructure and gain unlawful access to private data. An example is shown in the code below.

Source

More often than not, broken access control usually involves inserting URL queries or strings aimed at gaining access to poorly protected user accounts, admin features, and resources. By understanding the process of building APIs and routing parameters, it’s possible for hackers to use particular queries (an example of which is shown below) maliciously.

Source

Risk Mitigation

OWASP, among other notable entities, has suggested numerous ways in which one can guard against broken access control, some of which are:

  1. Reducing reliance on names for routes and using key-value pairs instead. as they’re less easy to predict.  
  2. Ensuring web pages don’t have predictable names, which, like the previous suggestion points out, helps prevent URL path guesses that can compromise the security of your platform.
  3. Making sure all web pages (depending on the nature of the platform) have authentication checks. 
  4. Customizing exceptions and error codes, making them harder to guess for hackers.
  5. Denying access to all functionalities on a platform by default makes it harder for hackers to gain unauthorized access to features simply by having a URL trigger.
  6. Leveraging access control and role-based authentication systems to ensure that permissions and privileges depend on the nature of a user on the platform.
  7. Avoiding the use of secrecy as the only protection for functions, URLs, and users on a platform.
  8. Giving users just enough privileges to carry out the activities assigned to their role.

Final Thoughts

Broken access control is a real threat that most people don’t think of because they feel it’s too simplistic for hackers to use. While broken access control seems like a no-brainer trick, it is difficult to guard against completely. Thus, software developers must pay attention to the process of authorization and authentication of users to ensure that neither the admin nor users can be compromised by parlor tricks like broken access control. Defining user roles and ensuring that these are specific enough to make sure that no user has more access than they require are great ways of ensuring that people are unable to break access privileges.

SHARE
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on LinkedInShare on TelegramShare on BlueskyShare on Mastodon

Search

Translation

CVE ALERTS
📧

Email Delivery
Get threat intel straight to your inbox.

♾️

Unlimited Vendors
Track every technology in your stack.

🚨

All New CVE Alerts
Be the first to know about new flaws.

⚙️

Custom EPSS Threshold
Filter noise, focus on real risks.

💬

Slack & Teams Webhook
Integrate directly into your SecOps.

🚫

100% Ad-Free
Enjoy an uninterrupted reading experience.

$7/mo
Subscribe Now

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-42016CVSS 8.1
    JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions before 7.133.11 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack due to a validation...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Sep 11, 2026
  • CVE-2026-42018CVSS 7.5
    JFrog Artifactory could return an internal anonymous-user token to an unauthenticated caller when anonymous access is disabled, potentially...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Sep 11, 2026
  • CVE-2026-20079CVSS 10.0
    A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated,...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 9, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 9, 2026
  • CVE-2025-25249CVSS 8.1
    A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2.0 through...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 9, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 9, 2026
  • CVE-2026-87491
    Out of bounds write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to execute...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 9, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 9, 2026
  • CVE-2026-19490
    Vulnerability in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: from 14.1 through 73.32 and from 13.1...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 9, 2026
  • CVE-2026-75650CVSS 10.0
    Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability that...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 8, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 8, 2026
  • CVE-2026-81963CVSS 7.8
    Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows Update Stack allows an authorized attacker to elevate...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 8, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

🔴 Live Critical Threats

  • CVE-2026-8778CVSS 9.8
    The MIPL Grouped Checkout Fields for WooCommerce – Customize & Organize Checkout...
  • CVE-2026-82107CVSS 9.6
    IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote...
  • CVE-2026-82100CVSS 9.6
    IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote...
  • CVE-2026-81204CVSS 9.8
    IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote attacker to...
  • CVE-2026-80424CVSS 9.1
    IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote...
  • CVE-2026-79724CVSS 9.8
    IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote attacker to...
  • CVE-2026-78573CVSS 9.8
    IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.7 could allow a remote attacker...
  • CVE-2026-45764CVSS 9.1
    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network...
  • CVE-2026-19646CVSS 9.1
    IBM Common Licensing Agent 9.0, Agent 9.0.0.1, Agent 9.0.0.2, ART 9.0, ART...
  • CVE-2026-89094CVSS 9.9
    Forgejo before 16.0.4 allows remote code execution via a crafted template repository...
Powered by CVE WATCHTOWER

Our Websites
  • Penetration Testing Tools
  • The Daily Information Technology
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Daily CyberSecurity

    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise with us
    • Announcement
    • Contact
    • Contributor Register
    • Login
    • Disclaimer
    • DCMA
    • Privacy Policy
    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
    • Contact Us

    When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

    • CVE Watchtower
    • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
    • Q2 2026 Report
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • Bluesky
    • Facebook
    • Linkedin
    • Mastodon
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Youtube
    © 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.