Skip to content
June 23, 2026
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Watchtower
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Vulnerability Report
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • Technique
  • Vulnerability Scans or Pen Tests: Which Are More Critical for Your Cyber Plan?
  • Technique

Vulnerability Scans or Pen Tests: Which Are More Critical for Your Cyber Plan?

Do Son May 12, 2021 5 minutes read
tech-secu

The best cybersecurity programs have layered approaches to security, and they monitor the resilience and effectiveness of those layers constantly.

Security professionals have a variety of tools for this at their disposal, and an excellent cyber plan includes both vulnerability scans and penetration testing to get after security vulnerabilities through multiple avenues. 

However, if a business has the budget for only one of these services, which is the most critical? Which tool, if neglected, could have a worse impact on the network? Let’s find out. 

What’s the Difference Between Vulnerability Scans and Pen Testing?

Before determining which is more important, it’s helpful to review the difference between these two different cyber tools. 

Vulnerability scans are automated scans that are designed to help identify potential vulnerabilities in network devices. These devices might include switches, routers, firewalls, applications, or servers. 

Vulnerability Scans

Vulnerability scans are usually carried out by an organization’s IT department, or the service provider they utilize for IT support if they don’t have a dedicated team. 

As mentioned above, these scans are usually automated and can be set to be done automatically at certain intervals. Based on the industry, there are certain regulatory standards that must be adhered to as to how often vulnerability scans need to be done, and what they need to scan. 

Scans can be done either internally to the network, or externally. In either case, scans check for known vulnerabilities on a network that could be exploited. 

These could include a multitude of vulnerabilities, but some of the most common include:

  • Weak or outdated encryption
  • Self-signed certificates
  • Outdated operating systems
  • Issues with permissions

One important thing to note is that scans can only look for known vulnerabilities; in other words, they’re not effective against zero-day exploits. Nevertheless, vulnerability scans are a critical part of any network defense strategy. 

Pen Testing

Vulnerability scanning doesn’t actually do anything, however; it just reports on potential issues with cybersecurity. In other words, it’s non-intrusive. 

It’s most effective when used in conjunction with periodic penetration testing, or pen testing. Pen testing is when a professional performs active tests on vulnerabilities on your system, to see if they could gain unauthorized access to any portions of your network. 

Pen testing is best done as a portion of a holistic cybersecurity plan, and it can help validate some of the vulnerabilities a simple scan discovers. 

Vulnerability scans are known for returning a fair amount of false positives, but a good pen tester can attempt to exploit those results to see if there are other controls already in place that mitigate the vulnerability. They can also determine if it’s even a true vulnerability. 

Since pen testing requires a professional to carry out, it’s usually more expensive than vulnerability scans. However, a company could consider bringing in a pen tester for limited testing if a scan returns a particularly critical vulnerability. 

Focusing on the scope of pen testing is a way to decrease both the intrusiveness of the test, as well as the cost to perform it. 

Pen testing is a critical part of network security because it replicates a real-world scenario where a hacker might try to gain access to a network. A good pen tester can replicate those conditions and find holes or security gaps that vulnerability scans simply can’t identify. 

So Which One’s More Important for Your Network?

Now that we have a basic understanding of the difference between vulnerability scans and pen testing, which one of these tools is actually more critical for your cyber plan? 

At first, one might think vulnerability scans are more important. Indeed, running regular scans should be built into a cyber plan. These scans, in addition to running at set intervals, should also be conducted whenever there is a major network change. 

This allows the IT team and cyber team to ensure that any new changes or network topology aren’t introducing unforeseen vulnerabilities to the rest of the network. Some vendors even sell scanners that identify and scan any new devices added to a network, which can help teams identify potential issues prior to a regularly scheduled scan.

However, in order for a cyber plan to be truly effective, enterprises can’t skip periodic pen testing. Sure, malicious actors will run external vulnerability scans to identify gaps the same way the company will be, but those actors can exploit vulnerabilities in ways that scans simply can’t predict. 

Pen testers are the pros you call when you have vulnerabilities but need to make sure they’re actually gaps to be concerned about. They can give you an outside perspective and ensure you know whether your network is truly secure. They provide a service that most replicates the situation a bad actor will experience. 

Even if you conduct pen testing less frequently than vulnerability scans, or only after a major vulnerability is identified, it’s important to build regular pen testing into your cyber plan. Doing so can help give you the peace of mind that your network is secure, and that you’re aware of the gaps and are taking steps to close them. 

For those reasons, and for the extra layer of security that pen testing provides, they’re the more critical tool for your cyber plan to be truly successful. 

Share this article:

Facebook Post LinkedIn Telegram

Search

Translation

CVE WATCHTOWER
🚨

Receive alerts for vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.

⚡

Get notified instantly when a Proof of Concept (PoC) exploit is published.

🔍

Access critical info on vulnerabilities even when marked as "RESERVED".

🧠

Insights powered by decades of expertise and global intelligence sources.

🎯

Customize alerts with up to 10 keywords for your specific tech stack.

📊

Export the raw CVE database for SIEM integration and reporting.

Upgrade Package

🔴 Live Critical Threats

  • CVE-2026-56315CVSS 9.8
    picklescan before 1.0.4 fails to block at least seven Python standard library...
  • CVE-2026-56274CVSS 9.9
    Flowise before 3.1.2 contains multiple OS command injection vulnerabilities in the Custom...
  • CVE-2026-11374CVSS 9.0
    In ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus, RecoveryManager Plus, M365 Manager Plus, and ADAudit Plus,...
  • CVE-2026-12866CVSS 9.8
    All versions of the package expr-eval are vulnerable to Code Execution via...
  • CVE-2026-54352CVSS 9.6
    ## Summary `POST /api/pwa/process-zip` at `packages/server/src/api/routes/static.ts:24` accepts a builder-uploaded `.zip`, extracts it...
  • CVE-2026-48746CVSS 9.1
    vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs)....
  • CVE-2026-48170CVSS 9.1
    ## Summary `scim-patch` performs prototype pollution when applying a SCIM PATCH operation...
  • CVE-2026-46495
    ## Summary **Description** A Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) issue in OpenDJ's...
  • CVE-2026-56348CVSS 9.1
    n8n before 2.20.0 contains a credential exfiltration vulnerability in the POST /rest/dynamic-node-parameters/options...
  • CVE-2026-46488
    ### Summary An authentication bypass vulnerability exists due to improper trust in...
Powered by CVE WATCHTOWER

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-20230CVSS 8.6
    A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified...
  • CVE-2026-4020CVSS 7.5
    The Gravity SMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and...
  • CVE-2026-10735
    Multiple plugins by ShapedPlugin contain a backdoor in various versions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to...
  • CVE-2026-20262CVSS 6.5
    A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated,...
  • CVE-2026-54420CVSS 8.5
    LiteSpeed cPanel plugin before 2.4.8 (as distributed in LiteSpeed WHM PlugIn before 5.3.2.0) mishandles symlinks provided by a...
  • CVE-2026-53435CVSS 8.8
    In Jenkins 2.567 and earlier, LTS 2.555.2 and earlier, it is possible for attackers to have Jenkins deserialize...
  • CVE-2026-10795CVSS 8.1
    The UpdraftPlus: WP Backup & Migration Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions...
  • CVE-2026-11645
    Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.103 allowed a remote attacker...
  • CVE-2026-50751CVSS 9.3
    A logic flow weakness in Remote Access and Mobile Access certificate validation in deprecated IKEv1 key exchange allows...
  • CVE-2026-20245CVSS 7.8
    A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated, local...
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Our Websites
  • Penetration Testing Tools
  • The Daily Information Technology
  • Daily CyberSecurity

    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise with us
    • Announcement
    • Contact
    • Contributor Register
    • Login
    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
    • Contact Us

    When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA NOTICE
    • Linkedin
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
    © 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.