In a case spanning sixteen years and regarded as one of the most protracted antitrust battles in the history of the technology sector, Intel has once again suffered a setback. According to a Reuters report, the company’s latest appeal against the European Commission’s earlier decision to impose a €376 million fine has failed. While the court upheld the Commission’s finding of wrongdoing, it reduced the penalty by roughly one-third, lowering it to €237 million (approximately $276.6 million).
The origins of this dispute date back to 2009, when mobile computing was still in its infancy and netbooks dominated the PC market. At the time, the European Union accused Intel of violating antitrust law on two fronts:
- Employing illicit hidden rebates to push competitors out of the PC processor market.
- Paying manufacturers to delay or halt the production of devices powered by AMD processors.
The latest ruling focuses specifically on the second allegation—conduct described as “naked restrictions.” The court determined that between 2002 and 2006, Intel made payments to HP, Acer, and Lenovo with the intention of suppressing competition and limiting AMD’s market presence.
The legal battle has seesawed through various European courts for more than a decade. Intel has achieved partial victories along the way: in 2022, the General Court annulled the original ruling concerning hidden rebates, and the EU Court of Justice confirmed that decision last year, effectively voiding the original €1.06 billion (roughly $1.2 billion) fine.
However, the €376 million penalty related to the naked restrictions was reaffirmed in 2023. Intel’s latest appeal sought to overturn this remaining portion, but ultimately secured only a reduction in the fine.
Although this judgment appears to draw the saga to a close, both the European Commission and Intel still retain the right, under EU legal procedure, to appeal aspects of the ruling to the bloc’s highest court.