Skip to content
September 27, 2026
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q2 2026 Report
    • CVE Alerts
    • CVE Alert Settings
    • Pricing
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Free Tools
    • CVSS 3.1 Calculator
    • Certificate Viewer
    • DNS Lookup
    • Encoder & Hash Generator
    • IP / Subnet Calculator
    • Whois Lookup
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Weekly Recap
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • News
  • Technology
  • Amazon plans to completely abandon the Oracle database in early 2020
  • Technology

Amazon plans to completely abandon the Oracle database in early 2020

Do Son August 2, 2018 4 minutes read
Add Daily CyberSecurity as a preferred source on Google

Amazon’s development in the data center technology provider has gradually transformed many of its long-standing suppliers into competitors that are difficult to be inclusive. Oracle is one of them. Recently, Amazon is considering a new round of attacks on Oracle. According to people familiar with the matter, the e-commerce giant has moved most of its internal infrastructure to Amazon Web Services (AWS) and plans to completely remove Oracle’s proprietary database software in the first quarter of 2020.

This shift also marks the rapid rise of Amazon in the enterprise computing arena and further demonstrates the hard struggle of Oracle in the process of continuously shifting its work to the cloud platform and abandoning the traditional data center. Thanks to the development of AWS (the business grew by 49% in the second quarter), Amazon surpassed Alphabet at the beginning of this year to become the world’s second-largest listed company.

At the same time, Oracle’s size is roughly the same as it was four years ago, and its share price is slightly higher than the rate at the end of 2014. When the report first came out, Oracle’s share price fell 1%.

Five years ago, Amazon began planning to remove Oracle, an insider who asked for anonymity. Some of Amazon’s core shopping business still relies on Oracle, and the entire migration process takes about 14-20 months. Another person said that in the first few years of the transfer, Amazon had begun to consider giving up Oracle, but the decision at the time was that early action might require more engineering work and had little effect.

Informed sources said that when Amazon faced a significant problem with Oracle, the latter’s database technology could not be extended to meet Amazon’s performance needs. Another person said that the move might be completed in mid-2019, adding that the new technology that relies on the Oracle database has not been developed for quite some time.

Amazon’s infrastructure is not foolproof. During the Amazon Prime Day shopping spree last month, the company’s continued demand for capacity upgrades almost caused a crisis, and the company’s system proved unable to handle the sudden surge in traffic.

The shopper reported many attempts to access the site, and it is said that this issue is related to the collapse of the internal program Sable, which uses Sable to provide storage and services for retail and digital businesses.

The Information reported in January that Amazon is working to reduce its reliance on Oracle. Dr. Brian White, an analyst at Drexel Hamilton, stated to refute the report and cited Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison at the company’s teleconference meeting in December last year. Ellison said, “A company you’ve heard of just gave us another $50 million this quarter to buy Oracle database and other Oracle technologies. That company is Amazon.”

An Amazon spokesperson declined to comment. Oracle spokesman Amazon has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on Oracle’s technology.

The two companies have been in a fierce war of words. Last year, Oracle executives boasted about the cost advantages of using company database software. AWS CEO Andy Jassy retaliated that Oracle “has insufficient strength in the cloud computing space.”

In 2014, after AWS launched the Aurora Guanxu database service, competition became more and more intense. This service straightens the core market of nails. Amazon also provides a tool to help companies move their databases to the cloud.

But in 2016, Ellison told analysts that Amazon’s cloud services are still not ready for prime time. “Our database customers have no way to run important machine jobs on Amazon.”

Since then, however, Oracle has not been able to achieve the significant market share in cloud infrastructure. AWS leads the market, followed by Microsoft, Google, Alibaba, and IBM.

Since the company no longer disclosed the benefits of cloud services in the last quarter, investors have now abandoned speculation about the scale of Oracle cloud services.

Via: CNBC

Related coverage

  • Gartner issues Top six Security and Risk Management Trends For 2018
  • UK CMA Designates Google with Strategic Market Status Over 90% Search Dominance
  • Hacker announced to break the Nintendo’s Switch firmware, it will be released this summer
  • Microsoft and BlackBerry Collaborate to provide a secure environment for mobile workforce
  • OpenAI Introduces “Take a Break” Reminders to ChatGPT, Refines Responses for High-Stakes Decisions
  • Built-in Japan AI security camera can identify customers stealing through suspicious behavior
Track all actively exploited CVEs →

Support Our Threat Intelligence

Find our tech and OS security coverage helpful? Support our work today and unlock a 100% ad-free reading experience!

Buy Me a Coffee Logo Buy Me a Coffee
Select your plan
Free Pro Team

Hover over a plan to see its benefits.

Get Zero-Hour Vulnerability Alerts

Critical CVEs, CVSS scores, and PoC updates — straight to your inbox every week.

We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

SHARE
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on LinkedInShare on TelegramShare on BlueskyShare on Mastodon
Written by
@DdoS · Security Researcher

Do Son

Do Son is the Founder and Editor of SecurityOnline.info. Working in cybersecurity since 2013, he reports on vulnerabilities, malware, and emerging threats, providing timely analysis to help organizations and individuals stay ahead of evolving risks.

Tags: Amazon Oracle database

Search

Translation

CVE ALERTS
📈

EPSS Spike Alerts
Catch risk spikes before they make headlines.

🎯

Custom EPSS/CVSS
Set score thresholds to effectively filter noise.

🛡️

Exploit Intel
Real-world exploit signals beyond the KEV catalog.

🐙

GitHub Issues
Auto-create alert tickets without duplication.

📬

Weekly Digest
Clean summaries, eliminating email spam.

🏷️

Watchlist Groups
Tag vulnerabilities by team (Infra/AppSec/SOC).

🔀

Smart Routing
Route chat channels based on severity levels.

🚨

RBP Tracker
Early warning detection and tracking system.

Subscribe – $7/mo or try free for 14 days →

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-65660CVSS 8.8
    Improper control of generation of code (\'code injection\') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 25, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 25, 2026
  • CVE-2026-5430CVSS 10.0
    The JWT authentication mechanism accepts tokens signed with algorithms other than those explicitly configured or supported. This allows...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 24, 2026
  • CVE-2026-71362CVSS 9.1
    Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 24, 2026
  • CVE-2026-48842CVSS 8.1
    Roundcube Webmail 1.6.x before 1.6.16 and 1.7.x before 1.7.1 has Pre-authentication SQL injection in the virtuser_query plugin via...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-87902
    Unauthenticated path traversal in page-template resolution leading to conditional RCE An unauthenticated attacker can make get_page_template() page-template resolution...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 25, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 23, 2026
  • CVE-2026-94127CVSS 9.8
    When a BIG-IP APM access policy and an OAuth profile is configured on a virtual server, specific malicious...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 22, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-85102CVSS 9.8
    Improper certificate trust validation during VPN negotiation in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway may allow an unauthenticated remote...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 22, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-93616CVSS 9.8
    A directory traversal and file upload vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload and execute arbitrary scripts on...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Sep 22, 2026📅 Updated: Sep 22, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Critical Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-100741CVSS 9.8
    Eval injection in the JScript event-script dispatcher in Progressive Robot Ltd's hMailServer, versions 6.0.0 through 6.3.3 on Windows,...
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-94130CVSS 9.3
    Joomla Extension - joomlaboat.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in YouTube Gallery extension < 5.7.3 - An SQL injection...
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-97161CVSS 9.2
    Joomla Extension - lomart.fr - Various path traversal / file access vectors in UP plugin extension 5.0.0-5.2.0, 6.0.0-6.0.29
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-97163CVSS 10.0
    Joomla Extension - lomart.fr - Unauthenticated remote code installation in UP plugin extension 5.0.0-5.2.0, 6.0.0-6.0.29
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-94132CVSS 9.5
    Joomla Extension - acymailing.com - Remote Code Execution vulnerability in mailbox action feature in AcyMailing Enterprise extension <...
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-97160CVSS 9.4
    Joomla Extension - lomart.fr - Authenticated, privileged PHP command injection in UP plugin extension 5.0.0-5.2.0, 6.0.0-6.0.29
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-100835CVSS 9.1
    Contrast before 1.16.0 is susceptible to remote attestation relay attacks. Contrast accepted any TEE attestation report that verified...
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
  • CVE-2026-100721CVSS 9.5
    vm2 before 3.12.2 contains an authorization bypass in the NodeVM external-module resolver. When an embedder configures `require.external` with...
    📅 Updated: Sep 27, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Daily CyberSecurity

  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise with us
  • Announcement
  • Contact
  • Contributor Register
  • Login
  • Disclaimer
  • DCMA
  • Privacy Policy
  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
  • Contact Us

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

  • CVE Watchtower
  • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
  • Q2 2026 Report
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
© 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.