Skip to content
July 5, 2026
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Watchtower
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Vulnerability Report
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • News
  • Technology
  • Amazon plans to completely abandon the Oracle database in early 2020
  • Technology

Amazon plans to completely abandon the Oracle database in early 2020

Do Son August 2, 2018 4 minutes read
Add as a preferred
source on Google

Amazon’s development in the data center technology provider has gradually transformed many of its long-standing suppliers into competitors that are difficult to be inclusive. Oracle is one of them. Recently, Amazon is considering a new round of attacks on Oracle. According to people familiar with the matter, the e-commerce giant has moved most of its internal infrastructure to Amazon Web Services (AWS) and plans to completely remove Oracle’s proprietary database software in the first quarter of 2020.

This shift also marks the rapid rise of Amazon in the enterprise computing arena and further demonstrates the hard struggle of Oracle in the process of continuously shifting its work to the cloud platform and abandoning the traditional data center. Thanks to the development of AWS (the business grew by 49% in the second quarter), Amazon surpassed Alphabet at the beginning of this year to become the world’s second-largest listed company.

At the same time, Oracle’s size is roughly the same as it was four years ago, and its share price is slightly higher than the rate at the end of 2014. When the report first came out, Oracle’s share price fell 1%.

Five years ago, Amazon began planning to remove Oracle, an insider who asked for anonymity. Some of Amazon’s core shopping business still relies on Oracle, and the entire migration process takes about 14-20 months. Another person said that in the first few years of the transfer, Amazon had begun to consider giving up Oracle, but the decision at the time was that early action might require more engineering work and had little effect.

Informed sources said that when Amazon faced a significant problem with Oracle, the latter’s database technology could not be extended to meet Amazon’s performance needs. Another person said that the move might be completed in mid-2019, adding that the new technology that relies on the Oracle database has not been developed for quite some time.

Amazon’s infrastructure is not foolproof. During the Amazon Prime Day shopping spree last month, the company’s continued demand for capacity upgrades almost caused a crisis, and the company’s system proved unable to handle the sudden surge in traffic.

The shopper reported many attempts to access the site, and it is said that this issue is related to the collapse of the internal program Sable, which uses Sable to provide storage and services for retail and digital businesses.

The Information reported in January that Amazon is working to reduce its reliance on Oracle. Dr. Brian White, an analyst at Drexel Hamilton, stated to refute the report and cited Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison at the company’s teleconference meeting in December last year. Ellison said, “A company you’ve heard of just gave us another $50 million this quarter to buy Oracle database and other Oracle technologies. That company is Amazon.”

An Amazon spokesperson declined to comment. Oracle spokesman Amazon has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on Oracle’s technology.

The two companies have been in a fierce war of words. Last year, Oracle executives boasted about the cost advantages of using company database software. AWS CEO Andy Jassy retaliated that Oracle “has insufficient strength in the cloud computing space.”

In 2014, after AWS launched the Aurora Guanxu database service, competition became more and more intense. This service straightens the core market of nails. Amazon also provides a tool to help companies move their databases to the cloud.

But in 2016, Ellison told analysts that Amazon’s cloud services are still not ready for prime time. “Our database customers have no way to run important machine jobs on Amazon.”

Since then, however, Oracle has not been able to achieve the significant market share in cloud infrastructure. AWS leads the market, followed by Microsoft, Google, Alibaba, and IBM.

Since the company no longer disclosed the benefits of cloud services in the last quarter, investors have now abandoned speculation about the scale of Oracle cloud services.

Via: CNBC

Get Zero-Hour Vulnerability Alerts

Critical CVEs, CVSS scores, and PoC updates — straight to your inbox every week.


We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related coverage

  • Reddit has finally changed in the first major redesign
  • Beyond the Glow: How iOS 27’s “Snow Leopard” Focus and Siri App Will Redefine the iPhone in 2026
  • Slack CEO Denise Dresser Joins OpenAI as CRO to Solve the Profitability Puzzle
  • Google’s Nano Banana Pro Model Solves AI Image Text Rendering with Gemini 3 Pro
  • Google Announces Git protocol version 2, Bringing Significant Performance Improvements

Support Our Threat Intelligence

If you find our CVE report and cybersecurity news helpful, consider supporting our work.

Buy Me a Coffee Logo Buy Me a Coffee PayPal
Crypto QR Code
USDT (TRC20):
TN8BdV8cp4T1Cd28gK9qTAnZknzzuwyUtm
USDT (ERC20):
0x3725e1a7d3bc5765499fa6aaafe307fabcd75bce

Share this article:

Facebook Post LinkedIn Telegram
Written by
@DdoS · Security Researcher

Do Son

Do Son is the Founder and Editor of SecurityOnline.info. Working in cybersecurity since 2013, he reports on vulnerabilities, malware, and emerging threats, providing timely analysis to help organizations and individuals stay ahead of evolving risks.

Tags: Amazon Oracle database

Search

Translation

CVE WATCHTOWER
🚨

Receive alerts for vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.

⚡

Get notified instantly when a Proof of Concept (PoC) exploit is published.

🔍

Access critical info on vulnerabilities even when marked as "RESERVED".

🧠

Insights powered by decades of expertise and global intelligence sources.

🎯

Customize alerts with up to 10 keywords for your specific tech stack.

📊

Export the raw CVE database for SIEM integration and reporting.

Upgrade Package

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-48282CVSS 10.0
    ColdFusion versions 2025.9, 2023.20 and earlier are affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Jul 3, 2026
  • CVE-2024-14037CVSS 9.8
    Redsea Cloud eHR contains an arbitrary file upload vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to achieve remote code execution...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Jul 3, 2026
  • CVE-2026-8451CVSS 8.8
    Insufficient input validation in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway leading to memory overread if NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway is configured...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Jul 2, 2026
  • CVE-2026-8037CVSS 9.6
    OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress ADC Products allows an un-authenticated attacker to...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Jul 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-45659CVSS 8.8
    Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 1, 2026
  • CVE-2026-48558CVSS 10.0
    SimpleHelp versions 5.5.15 and prior and 6.0 pre-release versions contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the OIDC authentication...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jun 29, 2026📅 Updated: Jun 29, 2026
  • CVE-2026-46817CVSS 9.8
    Vulnerability in the Oracle Payments product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: File Transmission). Supported versions that are affected...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Jun 29, 2026
  • CVE-2026-28496CVSS 9.4
    FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions prior to 0.8.0 have a Server-Side Template...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Jun 25, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

🔴 Live Critical Threats

  • CVE-2026-58426CVSS 9.6
    Gitea Actions Artifacts V4 signed URL HMAC ambiguity allows cross-repository artifact read...
  • CVE-2026-58289CVSS 9.0
    Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based)...
  • CVE-2026-22874CVSS 9.6
    Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.2 have incomplete SSRF protection in...
  • CVE-2026-20896CVSS 9.8
    Gitea Docker image versions up to and including 1.26.2 use REVERSE_PROXY_TRUSTED_PROXIES=* by...
  • CVE-2026-4321CVSS 9.8
    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection')...
  • CVE-2026-14544CVSS 9.8
    A flaw was found in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software)....
  • CVE-2026-9725CVSS 9.1
    The Printcart Web to Print Product Designer for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress...
  • CVE-2026-13768CVSS 10.0
    Gardyn devices expose a privileged iothubowner key. Access to this key will...
  • CVE-2026-57100CVSS 9.9
    Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an...
  • CVE-2026-45499CVSS 9.9
    Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to...
Powered by CVE WATCHTOWER

Our Websites
  • Penetration Testing Tools
  • The Daily Information Technology
  • Daily CyberSecurity

    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise with us
    • Announcement
    • Contact
    • Contributor Register
    • Login
    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
    • Contact Us

    When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA NOTICE
    • Linkedin
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
    © 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.