Skip to content
July 24, 2026
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q2 2026 Report
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Weekly Recap
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • News
  • Malware
  • New Hide ‘N Seek (HNS) IoT botnet is spreading rapidly, 14000 IP were infected
  • Malware

New Hide ‘N Seek (HNS) IoT botnet is spreading rapidly, 14000 IP were infected

Do Son January 26, 2018 3 minutes read
Hide 'N Seek
Add Daily CyberSecurity as a preferred source on Google

On January 26, security researchers at Bitdefender, an Internet security company, have found “Hide ‘N Seek” (HNS) a new IoT botnet. Experts said that the botnet first appeared on January 10, 2018. Now, HNS has been expanded from 12 to 14,000 units.

Bogdan Botezatu, a senior cyber threat analyst at Bitdefender, pointed out that unlike other IoT botnets that have emerged in recent weeks, HNS is not another variant of Mirai, but rather akin to Hajime.

Botezatu indicated that HNS is the second known IoT botnet with a peer-to-peer (P2P) architecture following the Hajime botnet. However, for Hajime, P2P functions are based on the BitTorrent protocol, while HNS has a custom built P2P communication mechanism.

Botezatu chart analysis in the report pointed out that each HNS bot contains another IP bot list. This list can be updated in real-time with the size of the botnet and the number of bots.

HNS will pass instructions and commands to each other, similar to the basis of P2P protocol. Bottezza shows that an HNS bot can receive and execute many command types such as data breaches, code execution, and interfering device operations.

Surprisingly, researchers did not find DDoS attacks in HNS, meaning that HNS was designed to be deployed as a proxy network in much the same way that most IoT botnets were weaponized in 2017. Earlier, DDoS attacks attracted so much attention that many botnets disappeared.

The HNS botnet initiates dictionary brute-force attacks on devices that have open Telnet ports, a propagation mechanism that, like its unique P2P zombie management protocol, is highly customizable.

The bot features a worm-like spreading mechanism that randomly generates a list of IP addresses to get potential targets. It then initiates a raw socket SYN connection to each host in the list and continues communication with those that answer the request on specific destination ports (23 2323, 80, 8080). Once the connection has been established, the bot looks for a specific banner (“buildroot login:”) presented by the victim. If it gets this login banner, it attempts to log in with a set of predefined credentials. If that fails, the botnet attempts a dictionary attack using a hardcoded list.

Once a session is established with a new victim, the sample will run through a “state machine” to properly identify the target device and select the most suitable compromise method. For example, if the victim has the same LAN as the bot, the bot sets up TFTP server to allow the victim to download the sample from the bot. If the victim is located on the internet, the bot will attempt a specific remote payload delivery method to get the victim to download and run the malware sample. These exploitation techniques are preconfigured and are located in a memory location that is digitally signed to prevent tampering. This list can be updated remotely and propagated among infected hosts.

 

But thankfully, HNS, like all IoT malware, cannot build persistence on an infected device, meaning that the malware is automatically deleted when the device restarts. This also frees stakeholders to manage the botnet around the clock because the creators keep monitoring the botnet to ensure continued access to the new bot.

Since HNS is a new IoT botnet, its creators will explore new ways of spreading and bot management technologies and are therefore in a state of constant change. Experts said that the botnet consisting of 14,000 bots should not be overlooked because botnets that generally have some “lethality” do not need tens of thousands of bots at all, and four or five thousand is enough.

Source: bleepingcomputer

Get Zero-Hour Vulnerability Alerts

Critical CVEs, CVSS scores, and PoC updates — straight to your inbox every week.


We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related coverage

  • Hadooken & K4Spreader Malware: 8220 Gang’s Latest Cloud Hijacking Tools
  • npm Malware Targets Atomic and Exodus Wallets to Steal Crypto Funds
  • Infostealers Use Telegram Bots for Data Exfiltration, Exploiting a Growing Threat
  • Financial Institutions in Asia and Middle East Hit by Evolving JSOutProx Malware Campaign
  • DragonForce Hides Backdoor C2 Inside Microsoft Teams TURN Relays
Track all actively exploited CVEs →

Support Our Threat Intelligence

If you find our CVE report and cybersecurity news helpful, consider supporting our work.

Buy Me a Coffee Logo Buy Me a Coffee PayPal
Crypto QR Code
USDT (TRC20):
TN8BdV8cp4T1Cd28gK9qTAnZknzzuwyUtm
USDT (ERC20):
0x3725e1a7d3bc5765499fa6aaafe307fabcd75bce

Share this article:

Facebook Post LinkedIn Telegram
Written by
@DdoS · Security Researcher

Do Son

Do Son is the Founder and Editor of SecurityOnline.info. Working in cybersecurity since 2013, he reports on vulnerabilities, malware, and emerging threats, providing timely analysis to help organizations and individuals stay ahead of evolving risks.

Tags: Hide 'N Seek

Search

Translation

CVE WATCHTOWER
🚨

Receive alerts for vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.

⚡

Get notified instantly when a Proof of Concept (PoC) exploit is published.

🔍

Access critical info on vulnerabilities even when marked as "RESERVED".

🧠

Insights powered by decades of expertise and global intelligence sources.

🎯

Customize alerts with up to 10 keywords for your specific tech stack.

📊

Export the raw CVE database for SIEM integration and reporting.

Upgrade Package

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-16232CVSS 9.1
    An authentication bypass vulnerability in the Check Point SmartConsole login process allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 22, 2026
  • CVE-2026-50522CVSS 9.8
    Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 22, 2026📅 Updated: Jul 21, 2026
  • CVE-2026-63030CVSS 9.8
    WordPress 6.9.x before 6.9.5 and 7.0.x before 7.0.2 is affected by a REST API batch endpoint route confusion...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 21, 2026📅 Updated: Jul 21, 2026
  • CVE-2026-60137CVSS 5.9
    WordPress 6.8.x before 6.8.6, 6.9.x before 6.9.5, and 7.0.x before 7.0.2 does not properly sanitise the author__not_in parameter...
    Admin intelCISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 21, 2026📅 Updated: Jul 21, 2026
  • CVE-2026-0770CVSS 9.8
    Langflow exec_globals Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 21, 2026
  • CVE-2021-27137CVSS 8.1
    An issue was discovered in router/upnp/src/ssdp.c in DD-WRT before 45724. An unsafe strcpy in the UPnP handling functionality...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 21, 2026
  • CVE-2026-6875CVSS 9.5
    ServiceNow has addressed a remote code execution vulnerability that was identified in the ServiceNow AI platform. This vulnerability...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Jul 18, 2026
  • CVE-2026-39808CVSS 9.8
    A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Jul 16, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

🔴 Live Critical Threats

  • CVE-2026-59940CVSS 9.8
    ## Summary A type confusion issue in `seroval.fromJSON()` allowed attacker-controlled JSON input...
  • CVE-2026-58630CVSS 10.0
    Improper access control in Azure App Service allows an unauthorized attacker to...
  • CVE-2026-57106CVSS 10.0
    Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Data Quality allows an unauthorized attacker to...
  • CVE-2026-56163CVSS 10.0
    Missing authentication for critical function in Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service allows an...
  • CVE-2026-15704CVSS 9.8
    In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.0.0, ABAC-enabled...
  • CVE-2026-62825CVSS 10.0
    Improper authentication in Azure Key Vault allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate...
  • CVE-2026-58275CVSS 10.0
    Missing authorization in Azure DNS allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges...
  • CVE-2026-56191CVSS 10.0
    Improper authentication in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to perform...
  • CVE-2026-56165CVSS 9.8
    Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Account allows an unauthorized attacker to execute...
  • CVE-2026-56160CVSS 9.1
    Improper authorization in Azure Red Hat OpenShift (ARO) allows an authorized attacker...
Powered by CVE WATCHTOWER

Our Websites
  • Penetration Testing Tools
  • The Daily Information Technology
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Daily CyberSecurity

    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise with us
    • Announcement
    • Contact
    • Contributor Register
    • Login
    • Disclaimer
    • DCMA
    • Privacy Policy
    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
    • Contact Us

    When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

    • CVE Watchtower
    • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
    • Q2 2026 Report
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • Linkedin
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
    © 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.