Skip to content
October 13, 2026
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Data
    • CVE Watchtower
    • Top Exploited CVEs
    • CVE Stats by Vendor
    • Q2 2026 Report
    • CVE Alerts
    • CVE Alert Settings
    • Pricing
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Free Tools
    • CVSS 3.1 Calculator
    • Certificate Viewer
    • DNS Lookup
    • Encoder & Hash Generator
    • IP / Subnet Calculator
    • Whois Lookup
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Weekly Recap
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • News
  • Android
  • Some Android vendors do not deploy the fully security updates
  • Android

Some Android vendors do not deploy the fully security updates

Do Son April 13, 2018 2 minutes read
Add Daily CyberSecurity as a preferred source on Google

Security researchers at the Security Research Lab in Germany have just made a startling discovery. After reverse engineering the operating system code of 1200 Android devices, Karsten Nohl and Jakob Lell found that some smartphone manufacturers failed to honestly patch the device. The work of the two people is mainly to check the code to confirm whether the security patches referenced in the mobile phone settings have been really applied.

However, in many cases, they have discovered a “Patch Gap” – some manufacturers do not actually have a patch.

Wired reported that SRL researchers have dished out a number of dishonest manufacturers. Even millet, one-plus, and Nokia-like big names have, on average, erroneously omitted one or three security patches.

In addition, the number of missing patches from HTC, Motorola, and LG is also 3 to 4 compared with what vendors claim. The average number of missing patches for ZTE and TCL handsets exceeds four.

SRL also pointed out the missing data between the patch and the chipset used by the phone. Those low-end machines that use cheap processors are more likely to skip patches.

For example, on the MediaTek model, the average number of missing patches is 9.7. In contrast, the number of devices skipped by Samsung processors is much smaller.

Google appreciated the research of SRL but pointed out that some of the devices analyzed may not be certified by Android, or fail to comply with the company’s security standards.

More importantly, Google pointed out that the security features of modern Android phones are in place, and even if they contain unpatched vulnerabilities, they are hard to crack.

In addition, under certain circumstances, the vendor may remove a vulnerable feature from the device instead of fixing it, which may also be an objective reason for the absence of certain vulnerabilities.

Finally, Google stated that it would cooperate with SRL in an in-depth investigation. Nohl also agreed with the company’s view that “some unpatched devices are still difficult to crack”, thanks to many security measures deployed by Google.

Source: Wired

Related coverage

  • Pixel Phone Turns into Webcam for Nintendo Switch 2 via USB, No Accessory Needed
  • LineageOS 23.0 Released on Android 16: New Camera App, Catapult TV Launcher, and Virtualization Support
  • Google Wear OS 7 Update: Gemini AI & Live Updates
  • Android 16: June Release Confirmed by Google at MWC
  • Pixel Power-Ups: AI Avatars, Watch Alerts, & Android 15’s Big Leap
  • Gboard with ability to make your own GIF finally landed Android client
Track all actively exploited CVEs →

Support Our Threat Intelligence

Find our tech and OS security coverage helpful? Support our work today and unlock a 100% ad-free reading experience!

Buy Me a Coffee Logo Buy Me a Coffee
Select your plan
Free Pro Team

Hover over a plan to see its benefits.

Get Zero-Hour Vulnerability Alerts

Critical CVEs, CVSS scores, and PoC updates — straight to your inbox every week.

We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

SHARE
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on LinkedInShare on TelegramShare on BlueskyShare on Mastodon
Written by
@DdoS · Security Researcher

Do Son

Do Son is the Founder and Editor of SecurityOnline.info. Working in cybersecurity since 2013, he reports on vulnerabilities, malware, and emerging threats, providing timely analysis to help organizations and individuals stay ahead of evolving risks.

Tags: Security Updates

Search

Translation

CVE ALERTS
📈

EPSS Spike Alerts
Catch risk spikes before they make headlines.

🎯

Custom EPSS/CVSS
Set score thresholds to effectively filter noise.

🛡️

Exploit Intel
Real-world exploit signals beyond the KEV catalog.

🐙

GitHub Issues
Auto-create alert tickets without duplication.

📬

Weekly Digest
Clean summaries, eliminating email spam.

🏷️

Watchlist Groups
Tag vulnerabilities by team (Infra/AppSec/SOC).

🔀

Smart Routing
Route chat channels based on severity levels.

🚨

RBP Tracker
Early warning detection and tracking system.

Subscribe – $7/mo or try free for 14 days →

🚨 Active Exploits in the Wild

  • CVE-2026-102255CVSS 10.0
    A Pre-authentication SSRF vulnerability exists in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface due to an unintended alternate access...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Oct 9, 2026
  • CVE-2026-105133CVSS 6.9
    A vulnerability was detected in Ahsay AhsayCBS up to 10.3.2. This affects the function checkSysPwd of the file...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Oct 9, 2026
  • CVE-2023-22894CVSS 4.9
    Strapi through 4.5.5 allows attackers (with access to the admin panel) to discover sensitive user details by exploiting...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Oct 8, 2026
  • CVE-2016-3081CVSS 8.1
    Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled,...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Oct 8, 2026
  • CVE-2015-3306CVSS 10.0
    The mod_copy module in ProFTPD 1.3.5 allows remote attackers to read and write to arbitrary files via the...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Oct 8, 2026
  • CVE-2015-5477CVSS 7.5
    named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.7-P2 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Oct 8, 2026
  • CVE-2021-3199CVSS 9.8
    Directory traversal with remote code execution can occur in /upload in ONLYOFFICE Document Server before 5.6.3, when JWT...
    CISA KEV📅 Added to KEV: Oct 8, 2026
  • CVE-2026-94504CVSS 7.2
    Ninja Forms 3.15.3 stores an anonymous non-RTE textarea value and renders it without safe HTML encoding in the...
    Admin intel📅 Updated: Oct 7, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Critical Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-50398CVSS 9.8
    Mercury D196G d196gv1-cn-up_2020-01-09_11.21.44 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the function sub_404CAEDC via the parameter fac_password.
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
  • CVE-2025-50401CVSS 9.8
    Mercury D196G d196gv1-cn-up_2020-01-09_11.21.44 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the function sub_404CAEDC via the parameter password.
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
  • CVE-2025-62863CVSS 9.8
    Ampere AmpereOne AC03 devices before 3.5.9.3, AmpereOne AC04 devices before 4.4.5.2, and AmpereOne M devices before 5.4.5.1 allow...
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
  • CVE-2025-62864CVSS 9.8
    Ampere AmpereOne AC03 devices before 3.5.9.3, AmpereOne AC04 devices before 4.4.5.2, and AmpereOne M devices before 5.4.5.1 allow...
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
  • CVE-2025-65834CVSS 9.8
    Meltytech Shotcut 25.10.31 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. A memory access violation occurs when processing MLT project files...
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
  • CVE-2025-67164CVSS 9.9
    An authenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the /storage/poc.php component of Pagekit CMS v1.0.18 allows attackers to execute...
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
  • CVE-2025-67165CVSS 9.8
    An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in Pagekit CMS v1.0.18 allows attackers to escalate privileges.
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
  • CVE-2025-67073CVSS 9.8
    A Buffer overflow vulnerability in function fromAdvSetMacMtuWan of bin httpd in Tenda AC10V4.0 V16.03.10.20 allows remote attackers to...
    📅 Updated: Oct 13, 2026
Powered by CVE Watchtower

Daily CyberSecurity

  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise with us
  • Announcement
  • Contact
  • Contributor Register
  • Login
  • Disclaimer
  • DCMA
  • Privacy Policy
  • About SecurityOnline.info
  • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
  • Contact Us

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

  • CVE Watchtower
  • CVE Statistics by Vendor 2026
  • Q3 2026 Report
  • Top Exploited CVEs
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Mastodon
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
© 2017 - 2026 Daily CyberSecurity. All Rights Reserved.