• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
Skip to content
May 25, 2026
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

Daily CyberSecurity

Zero-hour alerts. Unmatched analysis.

Primary Menu
  • Home
  • CVE Watchtower
  • Cyber Criminals
  • Data Leak
  • Linux
  • Malware
  • Vulnerability
  • Submit Press Release
  • Vulnerability Report
Light/Dark Button
  • Home
  • News
  • Technology
  • Some Network Performance Tests for Windows Server 2016 and Linux
  • Technology

Some Network Performance Tests for Windows Server 2016 and Linux

Ddos March 19, 2018 1 minute read
Windows Server 2016 and Linux

I believe many developers are interested in the difference in network performance between Windows Server and Linux. The Phoronix website recently tested some Netperf network performance metrics on Windows Server 2016 and Linux distributions. Let’s see what happens. The test machine configuration was: AMD EPYC 7551 + GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0 + 8 x 4GB DDR4-2666 + Samsung 960 EVO. The following is the system and detailed configuration of the tested machine.

 

The Netperf server instances running on the system are connected via Gigabit Ethernet and configured as Xeon E5-1680 v3 + ASUS X99-A + 4 x 4GB DDR4-2400 + 60GB Patriot Torch, using Ubuntu 17.04 and Linux 4.16 Git kernel.

 

Linux dominates the Netperf TCP test, but Manjaro 17.1.6 runs slower than Windows, and Intel’s Clear Linux runs fastest.

 

However, in the UDP test, Manjaro slightly ahead of Windows Server 2016.

 

The test data is temporarily over. The Phoronix website will conduct more tests next time, and it will conduct a larger and more formal network performance comparison of Windows/BSD/Linux. Please visit this site frequently to get more info.

Source, Image: Phoronix

Rate this post

Support Our Threat Intelligence

If you find our CVE report and cybersecurity news helpful, consider supporting our work.

Buy Me a Coffee Logo Buy Me a Coffee PayPal
Crypto QR Code
USDT (TRC20):
TN8BdV8cp4T1Cd28gK9qTAnZknzzuwyUtm
USDT (ERC20):
0x3725e1a7d3bc5765499fa6aaafe307fabcd75bce

Share this article:

Facebook Post LinkedIn Telegram

Related posts:

  1. Microsoft’s “Edit”: A Modern Take on the Classic MS-DOS Editor
  2. Firefox 141 Arrives: AI Tab Grouping, Linux Memory Boosts, and WebGPU on Windows
  3. Wine 10.15: A Major Step Towards Faster Windows Gaming on Linux
  4. CrossC2 and ReadNimeLoader: Inside the Multi-Stage Intrusions Targeting Linux and Windows Environments
  5. Word for Windows Will Soon AutoSave Documents to OneDrive by Default, Pushing Cloud Adoption
Tags: bsd Linux windows

Search

Translation

CVE WATCHTOWER
🚨

Receive alerts for vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.

⚑

Get notified instantly when a Proof of Concept (PoC) exploit is published.

πŸ”

Access critical info on vulnerabilities even when marked as "RESERVED".

🧠

Insights powered by decades of expertise and global intelligence sources.

🎯

Customize alerts with up to 10 keywords for your specific tech stack.

πŸ“Š

Export the raw CVE database for SIEM integration and reporting.

Upgrade Package

πŸ”΄ Live Critical Threats

  • CVE-2026-9478CVSS 9.8
    A weakness has been identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Impacted is the...
  • CVE-2026-9477CVSS 9.8
    A security flaw has been discovered in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This issue...
  • CVE-2026-9476CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This vulnerability affects the...
  • CVE-2026-9475CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This affects the function...
  • CVE-2026-9458CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The impacted element is...
  • CVE-2026-9457CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The affected element is...
  • CVE-2026-9456CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability was found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Impacted is the function...
  • CVE-2026-9455CVSS 9.8
    A vulnerability has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This issue affects...
  • CVE-2026-9454CVSS 9.8
    A flaw has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This vulnerability affects...
  • CVE-2026-9436CVSS 9.8
    A flaw has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The impacted element...
Powered by CVE WATCHTOWER

Recent Zero-Day Vulnerabilities

  • Exploited in the Wild: Critical OWA Spoofing Flaw (CVE-2026-42897) Hits On-Premises Exchange Servers
  • Exploited in the Wild: Maximum CVSS 10 SD-WAN Flaw (CVE-2026-20182) Grants Admin Control
  • Exploited in the Wild: Critical 9.8 CVSS RCE Hits Canon GUARDIANWALL MailSuite
  • Exploit Code Released: Public PoC Dumps for Windows BitLocker Bypass and SYSTEM Elevation Zero-Days
  • Exploited in the Wild: “Dirty Frag” Linux Vulnerability Grants Instant Root Access
  • Under Active Attack: Ivanti EPMM Zero-Day Exploited in the Wild via Harvested Admin Credentials
Our Websites
  • Penetration Testing Tools
  • The Daily Information Technology
  • Daily CyberSecurity

    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise with us
    • Announcement
    • Contact
    • Contributor Register
    • Login
    • About SecurityOnline.info
    • Advertise on SecurityOnline.info
    • Contact Us

    When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works

    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA NOTICE
    • Linkedin
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Youtube
    Copyright Daily CyberSecurity Β© All rights reserved.