EU Orders Google to Open Android to Rival AI Assistants and Share Search Data Under the DMA
Do Son 
The European Commission has issued two major legally binding decisions against Google under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The rulings require Google to open the Android operating system’s low-level permissions to competing AI assistant services. Furthermore, they compel the company to share its precious search data with third-party search engines and AI chatbots. These measures will dramatically redraw the AI competitive landscape on Android devices. At the same time, they have provoked fierce pushback from Google over user privacy and device security.
Breaking Gemini’s Privilege: Android’s Core Permissions Must Open Up
In today’s Android, Google’s own AI assistants such as Gemini enjoy the highest level of low-level access. They interact seamlessly with other applications and perform system-level operations. The EU views this as unfair competition against third-party AI assistants. As a result, rival alternatives hold little appeal for the 60 percent of European users on Android devices.
Under the new ruling, Google must grant third-party AI assistants core functional access equal to Gemini’s by July 2027. European Android users will then freely choose their default AI assistant in settings. Moreover, they will summon third-party apps like ChatGPT or Claude through “Hey Google”-style voice commands. They can even authorize those assistants to operate other apps on their behalf booking a taxi or replying to messages, for instance.
Handing Over the Crown Jewels: Forced Sharing of Google Search Data
Beyond the operating system, the EU has aimed squarely at Google’s most commercially valuable asset: search data. In the Commission’s view, the massive data trove Google has accumulated over the years grants it an unassailable competitive advantage.
Consequently, the EU requires Google to begin sharing the data it collects for search optimization as early as January 2027. Qualifying competitors include third-party search engines as well as AI chatbot developers such as OpenAI. Admittedly, the EU stresses that the data must undergo strict anonymization and review by an independent third-party body. Even so, the ruling plainly forces Google to hand its lifeblood data resources to competitors.
Google Fires Back: A Disaster for Privacy and National Security
Facing what amounts to a demolition order on its walls, Google responded immediately. Kent Walker, the company’s president of global affairs, issued a forceful statement. He warned that the two decisions would “severely undermine the vital privacy and security defenses of millions of Europeans.”
According to Google, opening deep Android permissions and always-listening background capabilities to external applications sharply increases device security risks. In addition, forced search data sharing means the intensely private search histories of European citizens would be exposed to unknown third-party companies without their knowledge or consent.
Walker went further, arguing that the rulings could leak trade secrets and even “endanger national security.” Remarkably, longtime archrival Apple stepped forward earlier to defend Google. Apple argued that such forced-openness measures would unleash an unmanageable privacy nightmare.
Europe’s Tightrope Walk Between Fair Competition and Security
The EU’s logic is straightforward. If the company that controls both the operating system (Android) and the data gateway (Google Search) keeps its privileges in the AI race, startups and rivals stand no chance. Therefore, the EU has simply ordered Google to open the door.
The price of this enforced equality, however, may well be a wholesale collapse of consumer privacy. Search data frequently contains intensely private information about personal health, finances, and even political leanings. Even after so-called anonymization, re-identifying individuals is hardly difficult once big data and AI cross-reference the records.
Furthermore, granting top-level Android permissions to third-party AI vendors effectively punches a super backdoor through the system’s tightly sealed sandbox. For malware authors, that is a heaven-sent opportunity. In this contest between antitrust enforcement and security protection, Google is widely expected to appeal and wage a prolonged legal battle. Ultimately, the outcome will profoundly shape the direction of the global AI ecosystem.
Support Our Threat Intelligence
If you find our CVE report and cybersecurity news helpful, consider supporting our work.
Buy Me a Coffee
PayPal
